Legal Opinion

Cuaresma v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 2008No. A08A0403PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

We granted interlocutory review in this case to determine whether the trial court correctly denied the defendants’ motion to suppress. Mark Cuaresma and Justin Crumbley were indicted after drug and weapon evidence was discovered during a search following a routine traffic stop. The trial court denied Cuaresma and Crumb-ley’s motion to suppress the evidence, concluding that the search was conducted pursuant to voluntary consent. Cuaresma and Crumbley appeal. We reverse because Cuaresma and Crumbley’s consent to the search was coerced.

When reviewing a trial court’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. State v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. State v. MenezesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Sommese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. The State v. DepolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Nunnally v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API