Legal Opinion

The State v. Depol

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 22, 2016No. A15A1947PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

The State of Georgia appeals from the trial court’s order granting Scott Depol’s motion to suppress the results of a breath test based upon the Supreme Court of Georgia’s recent decision in Williams v. State, 296 Ga. 817 (771 SE2d 373) (2015). Specifically, the trial court concluded that “the Defendant’s apparent voluntary intoxication left him without the ability to voluntarily consent to a search of his breath with the use of a machine, despite the lack of threats, benefits or promises from any of the three officers present on the scene.” For the reasons explained below, we…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Vergara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Woodruff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. The State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. The State v. BroganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. The State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. Yeong Sik Oh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API