Daniel v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Justice.
James Henry Daniel was convicted of trafficking in cocaine based on evidence found pursuant to a consent search of the vehicle Daniel was driving after he was stopped for a routine traffic offense. On appeal Daniel did not contest the legality of the initial traffic stop but instead argued that the officer improperly expanded the scope of the stop and that Daniel’s consent to search was the coerced result of an illegal seizure. Relying upon State v. Sims, 248 Ga. App. 277 (546 SE2d 47) (2001), the Court of Appeals rejected Daniel’s arguments. Daniel v. State, 260 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Salmeron v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Rosas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.