State v. Gibbons
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
Pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4), the State appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to suppress filed by Michael Stinemetz and Vincent Gibbons. The State contends the trial court erred by finding that the state trooper impermissibly expanded the scope of the traffic investigation and also erred by failing to find that the trooper had a reasonable suspicion to request Stinemetz’s consent to search his *860person. We disagree and affirm.
1. In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, an appellate court’s responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- VonLinsowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Holden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Cuaresma v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.