Legal Opinion
Krevis v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 8, 2001No. AC 19949PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Joseph Krevis, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) to deny benefits to him. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the board improperly affirmed the commissioner’s decision (1) denying the plaintiffs motion for extension of time to file a motion to correct, (2) denying the plaintiff reimbursement for a certain prescription utilized to treat diabetes and (3) determining that the defendant, the city of Bridgeport, was not estopped from denying…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bode v. Connecticut Mason Contractors, the Learning CorridorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Dibello v. Barnes Page Wire Products, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Sapko v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Sellers v. Sellers Garage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Bergin v. Department of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.