Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Mel MacK Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1975No. Civ. 15275PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

A partnership firm owns and operates several mobile home parks in Orange County. Whenever one of its tenants sells a mobile home through a mobile home broker, park management as a regular practice charges the broker a $300 fee before allowing the buyer to move into the park. The district attorney filed suit on behalf of the People for the purpose of enjoining the firm from collecting the fee, claiming it constituted consumer fraud (Civ. Code, §§ 789.7, 789.8) and unfair competition (Civ. Code, § 3369). In addition, the People requested restitution and the imposition of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. EstrellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Cacho v. BoudreauCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cline v. YamagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API