Legal Opinion

Davis-Robertson Agency v. Duke

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 17, 1953No. Civ. 384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERLING HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

This is an action instituted by William R. Davis and Mattie Sue Robertson operating a partnership under the name-of Davis-Robertson Agency, of Memphis, Tennessee, and A. Lee Robertson, general agent of said partnership, against Arthur Boykin Duke, trading as Duke Advertising Agency, of Gadsden, Alabama.

After alleging diversity of citizenship-between the parties and the requisite jurisdictional amount involved, the complaint alleges that the plaintiffs operate an advertising agency, the business of which is to procure from various merchants and operators of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Worrie v. ChristineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
  3. National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Deward & Rich v. Bristol Savings & Loan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Cheney Co. v. CunninghamDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alston Studios, Inc. v. Lloyd v. Gress & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. Power Distribution, Inc. v. Emergency Power Engineering, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  3. Arrowhead Travel, Inc. v. HintonLancaster County Circuit Court · 1991
  4. Fish v. CollinsFrederick County Circuit Court · 1987
  5. Kofoed Public Relations Associates, Inc. v. Stimson, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API