Legal Opinion

Cheney Co. v. Cunningham

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1941No. Civil Action 215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is a patent suit against Cunningham and Friedberg, then partners doing business as Roof Specialties Company. Since the suit started, a corporation by the same name has succeeded to the business of the partnership, and has been joined as a defendant. The suit involves a charge of infringement by defendants of four patents owned by plaintiff, i. e., Nos. 1,715,000; 1,728,955;- 1,939,619; and 1,871,585, relating to metal roof flashings.

Defendants have filed a counterclaim, charging plaintiff with unfair competition in trade through the misuse of patent threats…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard Bateman and Marguerite B. Jones, Partners, Trading as Ernest Jones Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Mid-Continent Inv. Co. v. Mercoid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Robinson v. DigaetanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. American Sign and Indicator Corp. v. SchulenburgDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
  5. Davis-Robertson Agency v. DukeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API