Cheney Co. v. Cunningham
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
This is a patent suit against Cunningham and Friedberg, then partners doing business as Roof Specialties Company. Since the suit started, a corporation by the same name has succeeded to the business of the partnership, and has been joined as a defendant. The suit involves a charge of infringement by defendants of four patents owned by plaintiff, i. e., Nos. 1,715,000; 1,728,955;- 1,939,619; and 1,871,585, relating to metal roof flashings.
Defendants have filed a counterclaim, charging plaintiff with unfair competition in trade through the misuse of patent threats…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard Bateman and Marguerite B. Jones, Partners, Trading as Ernest Jones Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Mid-Continent Inv. Co. v. Mercoid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Robinson v. DigaetanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- American Sign and Indicator Corp. v. SchulenburgDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
- Davis-Robertson Agency v. DukeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.