Worrie v. Christine
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
Arthur Murray enjoys a national reputation as a dancing master, teacher and exponent of modern ballroom dancing. He is the author of books, manuals and treatises on the style and art of dancing and the mode and manner in which it should be taught. It appears from the record that he and his wife operate a corporation known as “Arthur Murray, Incorporated”, with offices in the city of New York. Under, authority and contracts from this parent organization other corporations and individuals conduct dancing schools and studios throughout the United States wherein the “Arthur Murray” name is used…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Merriman v. Cover, Drayton LeonardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Walker Coal & Ice Co. v. WestermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Epes' Administrator v. HardawaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Masche v. NicholsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm Corporation, Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
- Worrie v. BozeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.