A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New, Jersey.
1Opinion of the Court
/. DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
We entirely concur in the statement of 'the court below that "the patent owner is justified in using all lawful means'to protect his'monopoly,” and that “he may give notice of his rights as he understands them, and of his intention to ask the courts *715to enforce them in suit to be brought for the purpose.” But the bill' in this case, which was dismissed on demurrer (99 Red. 160), charges the defendant with something more than the use of lawful means to protect its monopoly. It alleges, not merely that the defendant is giving notice of irs rights and of its intention to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1897
- Casey v. Cincinnati Typographical Union No. 3U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1891
- Kelley v. Ypsilanti Dress-Stay Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Howard Bateman and Marguerite B. Jones, Partners, Trading as Ernest Jones Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In Re Lawrence B. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.