Legal Opinion

Brown v. Forst

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1884No. 11,078PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The appellee, who is the widow of the appellant’s intestate, on February 8th, 1882, filed against the estate the following claim, verified by affidavit as the statute provides:

“Sarah Forst complains of William Brown, administrator of the estate of Conrad Forst, deceased, and says, that said estate is indebted to her for money had and received by the former administrator, John Stults, to be by him applied in. *249payment of debts of said estate, and to be accounted for, on final settlement and distribution of said estate, in the following items, to wit:
“ Money realized from the real estate of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riser v. SnoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Livingston v. NewkirkNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  3. Mills v. KuykendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Holderbaugh v. TurpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Cornthwaite v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pease v. ChristmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Merrill v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Security Bank Trust Company v. CostenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Crum v. MeeksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bingham v. Walker Bros., BankersUtah Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API