Legal Opinion

Pease v. Christman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1902No. 19,834PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From LaPorte Circuit Court; J. C. Richter, Judge. Action by Emma Christman against S. M. Pease, administrator of the estate of John Christman, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred to Supreme Court, under §1837u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee in the lower court Sought to be reimbursed out of the estate of her deceased husband, to the amount of $152, for money laid out and expended by her in the purchase of a suitable monument erected over his grave. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, under which the court was requested to' decide whether a claim for a monument was a valid and just one against the estate of the decedent. The court, in consideration of the agreed statement of facts, allowed the claim in favor of appellee to the amount of $152.60, and, over appellant’s motion for *643a new trial, adjudged that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Bendall's Distributees v. Bendall's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. Fairman's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  4. Lerch v. EmmettIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Crapo v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Ragan v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Hildebrand v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Estate of SilversteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Fillinger v. ConleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API