Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Newkirk

New York Court of Chancery

Decided February 18, 1818PublishedCited by 22 opinions

THE bill, the 26th of November, 1812, stated, that letters patent were granted the 8th of July, 1790, to John Earnest Pier, for lot No. 6, in the township of Mar« cellus. In 1791, Pier sold the lot to Peter Schuyler, for thirty pounds, and by writing under his hand and seal, sold and conveyed, or covenanted to sell or convey, the said lot, for the consideration aforesaid, to P. S: in fee, and delivered the deed to him.

Read the full summary

THE bill, the 26th of November, 1812, stated, that letters patent were granted the 8th of July, 1790, to John Earnest Pier, for lot No. 6, in the township of Mar« cellus. In 1791, Pier sold the lot to Peter Schuyler, for thirty pounds, and by writing under his hand and seal, sold and conveyed, or covenanted to sell or convey, the said lot, for the consideration aforesaid, to P. S: in fee, and delivered the deed to him. P. S., on the 24th of November, 1786, made his will, and devised the residue of his real and personal estate, after payment of his debts, to his wife, Gertrude, in fee. P. S.…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

1. The first question upon this case is, whether the plaintiffs were not, upon the death of Peter Schuyler, entitled, as his heirs at law, to lot No. 6, in Marcellus.

The will of the testator was made on the 24th of Novemher, 1786, and it was not afterwards altered or republished with the solemnities required by law. The will, therefore, did not, and could not, affect lands subsequently acquired.

It appears from the pleadings and proofs, that the testator, after making his will, purchased, or contracted to purchase, the lot in question, and that he received from John Earnest…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miller v. Irby's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Foster v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Sutherland v. HarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Duck v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Nelson v. MurfeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API