Legal Opinion

Wooldridge v. Arens

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

According to plaintiff’s application for compensation, petition for rehearing and complaint, on the 25th day of June, 1937, plaintiff, being then employed by B. A. Christianson, was engaged in logging, hauling timber, bucking timber and similar work in logging operations in Lincoln county, Oregon. Plaintiff’s showing is to the effect that at that time both his employer Mr. Christianson and he, plaintiff, had complied with all of the laws .pertaining to, and were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Plaintiff claims that, while thus engaged on said 25th day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lough v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rohde v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. James A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Tice v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kehoe v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Landauer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API