Legal Opinion

Tice v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1947PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This appeal presents important questions of procedure arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. §§ 102-1701, et seq., O. C. L. A. The plaintiff, a workman subject to the Act, claims that he suffered a compensable injury. He did not attempt to file a claim with the State Industrial Accident Commission until nearly a year after the occurrence of the alleged accident. The statute provides:

“No application shall be valid or claim thereunder enforceable in nonfatal eases unless such claim is filed within three (3) months after the date upon which the accident occurred.” § 102-1771 (e), O. C.L.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Schneider v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Journal Publishing Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976
  5. Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API