Tice v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This appeal presents important questions of procedure arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. §§ 102-1701, et seq., O. C. L. A. The plaintiff, a workman subject to the Act, claims that he suffered a compensable injury. He did not attempt to file a claim with the State Industrial Accident Commission until nearly a year after the occurrence of the alleged accident. The statute provides:
“No application shall be valid or claim thereunder enforceable in nonfatal eases unless such claim is filed within three (3) months after the date upon which the accident occurred.” § 102-1771 (e), O. C.L.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Schneider v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Journal Publishing Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976
- Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.