Legal Opinion

United States v. William Tharp

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1990No. 88-1829PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

William Tharp appeals from the sentence imposed on him after he pleaded guilty to *692conspiracy to distribute methamphet-amines, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, arguing that the Sentencing Guidelines should not have been applied in his case. Because we hold that the Guidelines apply to a conspiracy begun before their effective date and continuing afterwards, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.1

I

William Tharp was charged with two counts of using a communications facility to commit a controlled-substance felony, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), and one count of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. James O. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Thomas Lee FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. People v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API