Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Calkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1919No. 4481PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action in ejectment by Charles F. Calkins against the' Ponca City Land & Improvement Company, in which a motion of J. W. Lynch to be substituted in place of the named defendant was sustained. ' Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action in ejectment commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the Ponca City Land & Improvement Company and its tenant. Charles Bryant, for the possession of lot 23, in block 40, townsite of Hartman, a legal subdivision of Ponca City. Bryant disclaimed any interest in the lot, except as tenant of his codefendant, the Ponca City Land & Improvement Company, and dropped out of the case. Later, James W. Lynch filed his motion to be substituted in place of the Ponca City Land & Improvement Company, which motion was sustained, and thereafter the action proceeded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Myatt v. Ponca City Land and Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  4. Lynch v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Lynch v. the United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Page v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Adams v. Heirs of McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Starr v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Madrid v. BorregoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Huston v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API