Legal Opinion
Calista Enterprises Ltd. v. Tenza Trading Ltd.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 8, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-01045-SIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
This is a trademark dispute between two providers of Internet pornography. Plaintiff Calista Enterprises Ltd. (“Calista”) and Defendant Tenza Trading Ltd. (“Ten-za”) are businesses that operate websites in the adult-entertainment industry and stream sexually explicit videos. The parties’ claims and counterclaims concern U.S. trademark law under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114-1125, as well as related claims under Oregon law. Calista moves for partial summary judgment on its claim for cancellation of Tenza’s registered trademark, Calista’s…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- JFJ Toys, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Marketquest Grp., Inc. v. BIC Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Ossur hf v. Manamed Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Inhale, Inc. v. Inhale, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.