Legal Opinion
Hartford v. Regal Shoe Store No. 162, Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided October 30, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaurice Wahl, J.
The landlord herein seeks a final order claiming (a) that tenant’s occupancy under a lease has been terminated by due notice in writing; (b) that the present structure is to be demolished and that a new structure is to be erected, viz.: an art museum, for which plans have been duly approved; (c) that the tenant’s lease has come to an end and it holds over without the landlord’s permission.
The record reveals that tenant entered into a lease with the owner of the fee, Anfa Realty Co., Inc. on or about January 18, 1952, whereby tenant hired the demised premises, being store and basement known as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- H. Kauffman & Sons Saddlery Co. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Morse & Grossman, Inc. v. Acker & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Steinberg v. Forest Hills Golf Range, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Gilpin v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Pomeranz v. MoreCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schraub v. LandesNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Lefcourt Realty Corp. v. HoffzimerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959