Schraub v. Landes
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
In this action for brokerage commission plaintiff moves for an order granting him judgment by default as against defendants Meyer Horowitz, Shirley Horowitz and Nat Freedman.
Plaintiff alleges that these named defendants defaulted in answering or moving against his amended complaint within the 20-day limit as provided by law under section 263 of the Civil Practice Act.
The facts briefly stated are: On June 16, 1961 plaintiff
served his amended complaint upon defendants ’ attorney, which fact is substantiated by plaintiff by affidavit of service. The defendants had 20 days from this date in which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Rose Fair, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Hartford v. Regal Shoe Store No. 162, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- State-Wide Insurance v. MingioneNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Adkins v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977