Legal Opinion
Morse & Grossman, Inc. v. Acker & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1948PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
These appeals, presenting another aspect of the emergency rent legislation which affects property in the city of New York, require construction and application of section 8 of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.). The respondent in each case is a landlord; in one case, he is the owner of the building 162 Maiden Lane, in the other, of 35 De Peyster Street. Each brought a proceeding pursuant to subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Rent Law to recover possession of his respective building from the appellant who occupies both of these buildings as tenant.
For upwards of eighty years,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Twentieth Century Associates, Inc. v. WaldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Matter of Fifth Madison Corp. (New York Tel. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by21 opinions
- H. Kauffman & Sons Saddlery Co. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Washington Refrigeration Corp. v. Benhermax Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rabinovitz v. WilliamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- 300 West 56th St. Corp. v. EvanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Gaulang Realty Co. v. DyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.