Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haines

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1941No. Appeals, 104-107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

Thomas J. Haines, the appellant, a detective in the Township of Upper Darby, was indicted on four bills charging: (1) bookmaking, No. 382 June Sessions, 1940; (2.) aiding and abetting bookmaking, No. 383 June Sessions, 1940; (3) malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance in office, No. 384 June Sessions, 1940; and (4) conspiring with John J. McGuckin and Howard W. Stanton to engage in bookmaking and to set up and establish a gaming house, No. 432 June Sessions, 1940.

The appellant stood trial before Judge Fronefield on these four indictments with McGuckin and Stanton on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. KirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Com. v. Benz., Com. v. RoutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. CrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. KelleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Philadelphia ex rel. DePaul v. Philadelphia Authority for Industrial DevelopmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. Kelly, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1969
  5. In re Remove Constable Lafferty, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API