Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Underhill

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 24, 1862PublishedCited by 18 opinions

James P. Harkness and Mana his wife brought their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois,. against Isaac Underhill, to compel the defendant to convey to Maria Harkness the west'half of the east half of the southeast quarter of section 4 in township 8, range 8, east of the 4th principal meridian, in Peoria county," Illinois. •' The -material facts set forth in the bill are these : Isaac Waters, the father of Maria Harkness,…

Read the full summary

James P. Harkness and Mana his wife brought their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois,. against Isaac Underhill, to compel the defendant to convey to Maria Harkness the west'half of the east half of the southeast quarter of section 4 in township 8, range 8, east of the 4th principal meridian, in Peoria county," Illinois. •' The -material facts set forth in the bill are these : Isaac Waters, the father of Maria Harkness, wasasett-ler and housekeeper on the half-quarter section of land described. As such he was in possession of the whole eighty…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice .CATRON.

In the winter or spring of-1832, Isaac Waters and Stephen Stillman agreed to cultivate and improve-the east half of the southeast quarter of section four, a portion of which is in controversy in this suit.. This arrangement was made in view of the probability that Congress would, at its then session, pass a pre-emption law. It was further stipulated that Waters should make the necessaiy proof to obtain the pre-emption. As was anticipated, the act of April 5, 1832, was passed, allowing “to actual settlers, being house-' keeper?,” a pre-emption to enter a half-quarter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. McMasters Ex Rel. YbarbaSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Thredgill v. PintardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Boesche v. UdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Gibson v. HerriottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Pierce v. FraceWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. German Insurance Co. of Freeport v. HaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API