Legal Opinion
Boesche v. Udall
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 27, 1963No. 332PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
The question presented in this case is whether the Secretary of the Interior has authority to cancel in an administrative proceeding a lease of public lands issued under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, 30 U. S. C. §§ 181 et seq., in circumstances where such lease was granted in violation of the Act and regulations promulgated thereunder. Because of' a seeming conflict in principle between the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case, 112 U. S. App. D. C. 344, 303 F. 2d 204, and that of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Pan American Petroleum Corp. v.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Freeman v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.