Legal Opinion

Thredgill v. Pintard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1851PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

53 U.S. 24 (1851)

12 How. 24

JOSEPH P. THREDGILL, ADMINISTRATOR OF ARCHIBALD GOODLOE, DECEASED, APPELLANT,

v.

JOHN M. PINTARD.

Supreme Court of United States.

It was argued by Mr. Lawrence, and there was also a brief filed by Mr. Morehead, for the appellant, and by Mr. Crittenden, for the appellee, on whose side a brief was also filed by Mr. H.S. Foote and Mr. Sebastian.

The counsel for the appellant contended that the decree is erroneous, and ought to be reversed. It is admitted, in the opinion rendered, that the title of Pintard was invalid, and that Goodloe might have obtained a rescission of his…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · McLEAN.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blight's Lessee v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Wormley v. WormleySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  3. Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  5. Galloway v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1838

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Hussey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Lynn v. LynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Spiess v. NeubergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Beley v. NaphtalySupreme Court of the United States · 1898

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API