Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Frace

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1891No. 64PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Error to Superior Court, Pierce County„ The facts are fully stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

— -Plaintiff in error filed his complaint in eject*86ment and sought to recover possession of certain land therein described. Defendant in error answered, denying the allegations of the complaint and alleging as an equitable defense facts substantially as follows:

On December 20, 1880, the plaintiff in error filed his declaratory statement for the premises in controversy under the pre-emption laws of the United States. On February 13, 1883, lie made final proof to the satisfaction of the register and receiver of the United States land office at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Lytle v. the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Barnard's Heirs v. ASHLEY'S HEIRSSupreme Court of the United States · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Fairfax's v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Dickinson v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Wendel v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. German Insurance Co. of Freeport v. HaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API