Legal Opinion

Taylor v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1982No. 8110IC445PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The plaintiff presents two arguments on this appeal: (1) that the plaintiff is entitled to increased benefits under G.S. 97-29.1; and (2) that the “Commission erred and abused its discretion in denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees under G.S. 97-88 and G.S. 97-88.1.”

I

We first address the increase of the award under G.S. 97-29.1, which reads in part:

In all cases of total and permanent disability occurring prior to July 1, 1973, weekly compensation payments shall be increased effective July 1, 1977, to an amount computed by multiplying the number of calendar…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Barnhardt v. Yellow Cab CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Cox v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Bryson v. Phil Cline TruckingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Buck v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API