Legal Opinion

Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1996No. COA95-323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendants appeal an award to plaintiff of benefits under the Worker’s Compensation Act (the Act) by the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the Commission), contending the “Commission err[ed] in concluding defendants were not entitled to a subrogation interest or lien interest against the third-party settlement received by plaintiff [under] N.C.G.S. § 97-10.2.” We agree.

Pertinent factual and procedural background information is as follows: Plaintiff, a motorcycle mechanic employed by defendant-appellant Harley-Davidson of Metrolina, Inc. (Harley), was involved in a collision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Holland v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Rorie v. Holly Farms Poultry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Andrews v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Taylor v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API