Vanderwerf v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs, the Vanderwerf family and the estate of William K. Vanderwerf, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“SKB”), the pharmaceutical company who manufactured paroxetine, under the label Paxil, a medication prescribed to the decedent, who later committed suicide. We are unable, however, to overlook the ill-timed filing of the Vanderwerfs’ notice of appeal, because without a timely notice of appeal, we are deprived of jurisdiction to review the merits of the action. As a result of the plaintiffs’ sua sponte…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Fields v. Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bunn v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- De Leon v. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Grosvenor v. Qwest CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.