Legal Opinion
Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 6, 2011No. 09-2296PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
New Mexico Environment Department (“NMED”) inspectors Allan Morris and David Yantos seek to appeal the denial of qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit brought by Copar Pumice Co. (“Co- par”). 1 Morris and Yantos filed motions for summary judgment, which were denied based on the presence of disputed issues of material fact. The case proceeded to trial, after which appellants moved for judgment as a matter of law under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b). However, appellants subsequently and voluntarily withdrew their Rule 50(b) motion. Because their Rule 50(b) motion was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Haberman v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- George E. Mack v. Gary McCune Warden, Federal Penitentiary, Leavenworth, and Maurice J. Sigler, Chairman, United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Stewart v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- De Leon v. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Anderson Living Trust v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Winfield v. TrottierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.