Legal Opinion
California & Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 11, 1985No. 81-0571-CV-W-9PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT
BARTLETT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict seeks the award of prejudgment interest on the amount of damages found by the jury.
Defendant’s motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict argues that: 1) as a matter of law the evidence is insufficient to support plaintiffs’ claims of fraud, negligence, breach of contract and damages; 2) plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Aalco Wrecking Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Jean Farner, as Administratrix of the Estate of John W. Farner, Deceased v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- George TRIBBLE, Appellee, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California & Hawaiian Sugar Company v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Jacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
- Grantham v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stern Fixture Co. v. LaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ernster v. Ralston Purina Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991