Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Bradford

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 2010No. 1916 WDA 2009Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition of this case.

On September 24, 2008, Appellee, David L. Bradford, was charged with kidnapping, *639rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and terroristic threats. The affidavit of probable cause indicated that at approximately 10:00 p.m. on September 21, 2008, the victim, E.F., was sitting on the front steps of an apartment building located at 500 Todd Street, Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania, waiting for a friend. Appellee walked down the street and represented that he had keys to his apartment and would let her…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. WholaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API