Legal Opinion
Dubuc v. Sirmons
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 2001No. 93,793PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 Certiorari stands limited to whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming summary judgment for the defendants (on a dispositive theory that was interjected sua sponte ). We answer in the affirmative and remand the cause to the Court of Civil Appeals for its reconsideration of the appeal.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
¶2 On 4 May 1999 Brian Dale Dubuc [Dubuc, inmate or prisoner], an incarcerated inmate at Howard McLoud Correctional Center [HMCC], brought a civil rights action against five HMCC employees — Marty Sir-mons, John Richards, Wayne Morton, John Latimer and Cathy Morton —…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Woody v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Moore v. GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Huff v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burger v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Dubuc v. SirmonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Wilson v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.