Legal Opinion

Huff v. Huff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1984No. 59753PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

1. Invoking sua sponte a perceived fatal defect — the insufficiency of a single allegation in the appellant’s motion for new trial to support his argument on appeal under the strictures announced in Federal Corporation v. Ind. School District 1 — the Court of Appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal and decided the appellee’s counter-appeal.

2. Appellant urges on certiorari that the trial judge was clearly apprised, at the hearing on the motion for new trial, of the single error appellant urged below in support of his plea for re-examination of the trial court’s decision. He tenders…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Spears v. PrebleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Federal Corp. v. Independent School District No. 13Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Werfelman v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Willitt v. ASG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API