Legal Opinion
Burger v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 15, 2003No. 01-6285PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner Derek D. Burger, an Oklahoma state inmate appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus as falling outside the federal statute of limitations. Previously we determined that Burger had made the required “substantial…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Clark v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Fleming v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Paul Alywen Redd, Jr. v. Joe McGrathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Stephen C. Curtiss v. Mount Pleasant Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. GabaldonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.