State v. Cockrell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
Tbe State’s evidence was quite sufficient to make out a case of murder in tbe'first degree. The defendant’s evidence, on the other hand, supported his version of the matter. The jury has returned a capital verdict and rejected the defendant’s plea of self-defense in a trial free from reversible error. We can do none other than uphold the judgment.
Berry Joyner was called as a witness for the prosecution. He was asked on cross-examination “if he had not been accused of breaking up three homes before this time?” Objection sustained; exception. While the ruling on this objection might…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . DentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. GalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bame v. Palmer Stone Works, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Moore v. . EdmistonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874