Legal Opinion

State v. Cockrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

Tbe State’s evidence was quite sufficient to make out a case of murder in tbe'first degree. The defendant’s evidence, on the other hand, supported his version of the matter. The jury has returned a capital verdict and rejected the defendant’s plea of self-defense in a trial free from reversible error. We can do none other than uphold the judgment.

Berry Joyner was called as a witness for the prosecution. He was asked on cross-examination “if he had not been accused of breaking up three homes before this time?” Objection sustained; exception. While the ruling on this objection might…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . DentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. GalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Bame v. Palmer Stone Works, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Moore v. . EdmistonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API