Legal Opinion

State v. . Stanley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1947PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In view of the voluminous record and the number of exceptions taken upon the trial it is necessary to confine discussion to those objections which counsel for appellant have urged upon us as being of a more serious nature. However, it must be understood that those exceptions not discussed here or noted in the foregoing statement have received careful attention and have not been considered of sufficient merit to affect the result of the trial. In limine it is proper to say that the demurrers to the evidence, including the motion to nonsuit the graver charge of first degree murder, were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Bane v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. State v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. George v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API