Legal Opinion

State v. . Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The exceptions taken by the defendant, eliminating those which are formal, relate to an incident which occurred during the trial. A witness for the State testified on the cross-examination that she had reported the defendant’s conduct to the chief of police at the request of the girl’s mother. The inference was that the request had been communicated to the witness by letter. In arguing the case to the jury the defendant’s counsel referred to the fact that no letter had been introduced and that no explanation of its absence had been made. The court took a recess until the next morning, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. McLeod v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Holcomb v. . HolcombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. . HedgebethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . BullinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Clayton Banking Co. v. Farmers BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API