Legal Opinion

Cornelius v. Holland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1929No. Docket No. 5744PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

Prior to the transaction which gave rise to this litigation the defendants Granville Holland and Norton H. Edwards, together with their respective wives, acquired title to a lot in the city of Beverly Hills, an undivided one-half interest therein being conveyed to each couple as joint tenants. Each of the defendants paid one-half of the purchase price of the lot, their agreement being that they would improve the same, each bearing one-half of the cost of such improvement, and would endeavor to sell the property so improved at a profit, and that all profits or losses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Smith v. SchieleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Delano v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Gray v. the Janss Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vineland Homes, Inc. v. BarishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Arbuckle v. Clifford F. Reid, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Oaks v. BrahsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Jennings v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API