Legal Opinion

Arbuckle v. Clifford F. Reid, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1931No. Docket No. 4447PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover from defendant an alleged balance owing to him by defendant for commissions arising from a contract pertaining to the sale of real estate. The complaint sets forth, that at the date of said contract, defendant was engaged in the business of subdividing and improving tracts of real estate in the county of Los Angeles, and had in its employment salesmen for marketing the same; that pursuant to said contract plaintiff entered the employment of defendant, as director of sales and manager of real estate salesmen, and as such director…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. California Raisin Growers' Ass'n v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kester v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Nester v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
  3. Kritzer v. LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Anderson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ebberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API