Legal Opinion

Vineland Homes, Inc. v. Barish

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1956No. Civ. 21172PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Defendants Max Barish, Charles Mirken, Sam Wishnow and Ben Wishnow have appealed from a judgment against them, as follows.-

That the clerk of the superior court pay to plaintiff Vine-land Homes, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Vineland,” the sum of $5,742.75 deposited with said clerk by defendant Bank of America and that appellants have no right, title or interest in or to said funds.

That the appellants pay to Vineland the sum of $16,942.30 as damages for breach of contract for the sale of real property, $235.70 costs of suit, and $4,000 as attorneys’ fees to date of judgment, and that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dietrich v. DietrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Central Oil Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Pope v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Norris v. San Mateo County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Titcher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API