Legal Opinion

Skovborg v. Smith

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 12, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 N.J. Super. 389 (1950)

74 A.2d 910

KATHERINE CAROLINE SKOVBORG, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ANDREW SMITH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF,

v.

SIGRID SMITH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided July 12, 1950.

Mrs. Matilda G. Neefus-Palmer for the plaintiff (Messrs. Moffitt & Neefus, attorneys).

Mr. Harold N. Gast for the defendant counterclaimant (Messrs. Wight, Jorgensen & Gast, attorneys).

JAYNE, J.S.C.

I was heretofore requested to construe the last will and testament of the late Andrew Smith. My conclusions were expressed in an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Reese v. StiresNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Alt v. KwiatekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  3. Estate of DanhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Kicey v. KiceyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Shannon v. WattNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Booth v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fire Guard Sprinkler Corp. v. ManolioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Fire Guard Sprinkler Corp. v. ManolioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API