Legal Opinion

Kicey v. Kicey

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 4, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael Kicey, being seized of certain real estate, died in 1930, intestate, and without issue, leaving him surviving his widow (now deceased) and seven brothers and sisters — two of whom have filed bill for partition on the theory that the title to the property passed to the brothers and sisters as tenants in common. Defendants move to dismiss the bill, contending that title passed to the widow and not to the brothers and sisters, and that complainants therefore have no interest in the premises.

By the provisions of the statute, as it existed for many years, the inheritance devolved upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gerhardt v. SullivanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Reese v. StiresNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  3. Walker v. BennettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Gregory v. GregoryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
  5. Weyer v. WeyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. In Re FlaschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Exstrum v. Union Casualty and Life Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Brasko v. DuchekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Miller v. ReichNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API