Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Watt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 17, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On motion to strike out bill on tbe ground that it discloses no cause of action.

1Opinion of the Court

Grikfin, Y. C.

This case presents for solution the question, Did the defendant, in the lifetime of Mary J. Watt, his wife (now deceased), do that which should lead a court of equity to decree that he release his estate by the curtesy to the complainants as devisees under her will ?

The complainants base their claim upon the will of Mrs. Watt and an agreement entered into between husband and wife pending a suit brought by the wife in the supreme court of the State of New York for a divorce a mensa ei thoro, which agreement is evidenced by the decree of that court entered by the consent of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. De Witt v. Van SickleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
  2. Shilowitz v. ShilowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Chase v. ChaseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  4. Andrews v. TorreyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  5. Foley v. KirkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API