Legal Opinion

Incorporated Village of Lindenhurst v. Retsel Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant owns three parcels of land in the Village of Lindenhurst. The defendant conducts a lumberyard and home improvement business on one of these parcels. The instant appeal concerns the other two lots which are used in conjunction with the business to store lumber and other materials. One of these parcels is located to the south of Montauk Highway in a district zoned for residential use while the other is located to the north of the highway in a district zoned for business use. The outdoor storage of lumber is not permitted in either of these zoning districts (see, Lindenhurst Code…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. McLaughlin v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. FGL & L Property Corp. v. City of RyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Marzella v. MunroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Benjamin Kurzban & Son, Inc. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Town of Southampton v. SendlewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Town Board of Southampton v. 1320 Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Walter v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. BR Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Nationwide Nassau AmbulanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Ain v. GlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API