Legal Opinion
FGL & L Property Corp. v. City of Rye
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1985PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*113OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
Nothing in the zoning enabling provisions of the General City Law, the historical preservation provisions of the General Municipal Law or the Landmarks Preservation provisions of the Rye City Code empowers the City to mandate the manner in which property may be owned or held or to impose upon the owner of a tract containing historic structures, or purchasers of properties neighboring the tract, the cost of rehabilitation or enhancement of the properties. The order of the Appellate Division should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
I
Plaintiff is the owner in fee…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- St. Onge v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Moriarty v. Planning Board of Village of SloatsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Exxon Corp. v. Board of StandardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Common Council of City of PeekskillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Kasper v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.