Legal Opinion

Distefano v. Milardo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 11, 2004No. AC 23368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Olga J. DiStefano, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it directed a verdict on the malpractice and breach of contract counts for the defendants Joseph E. Milardo, Jr., an attorney, and Jozus, Milardo and Thomasson, the law firm in which Milardo is a partner, and after the jury verdict on the remaining counts in favor of the defendants.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) directed a verdict in favor of the defendants on the malpractice count, (2) instructed the jury that no…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Matthiessen v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Paul v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DiStefano v. MilardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Moore v. CroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Silano v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Ackerly and Brown, LLP v. SmithiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Kuehl v. KoskoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API