Legal Opinion
Silano v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 2004No. AC 24368PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff Pasquale Silano 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion for a directed verdict that was made by the defendant, Cumberland Farms, Inc., at the close of the plaintiffs case in this personal injury action. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly (1) granted the motion, (2) redacted a handwritten note that was admitted into evidence 2 and (3) denied his motion to open his case to present further evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the resolution of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hancock v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Smith v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michalski v. HinzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Keeney v. Mystic Valley Hunt Club, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Alliance Group Services, Inc. v. Grassi & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Beale v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Alfano v. Randy's Wooster Street Pizza Shop II, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.