Legal Opinion

Estate of Nelson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1900No. S.F. No. 2202PublishedCited by 14 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County against revocation of the probate of a will and from an order denying a new trial. H. M. Albery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Clunie & Bridgford, Crittenden Thornton, E. Weyand, and E. T. Crane, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtHabbison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeal. After the will of the above-named decedent had been admitted to probate, certain of his heirs filed a petition for the revocation of its probate. This petition was answered on behalf of three executors by their attorneys, Platt & Bayne and H. A. Powell— one executor not appearing to the citation therein; and by the devisees and legatees under the will by their attorney, Edwin Swinford. Upon a trial of the issues made by these answers judgment was rendered against the petitioners, and their motion for a new trial was afterward denied. From this order the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alameda County v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Walton v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. PreciadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Williams v. ShermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API