Legal Opinion

People v. Preciado

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1916No. Crim. No. 351PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles 0. Busiek, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Defendant was informed against by the district attorney of* the county of Madera for the crime of embezzlement. He was tried and convicted, and thereafter moved for a new trial, which was denied. He thereupon appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. The attorney-general has made a motion to dismiss the appeal principally upon the ground that defendant, in his application for an appeal under section 1247 of the Penal Code, failed to file or present to the trial judge an application containing a statement of the grounds and points on which he relies. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. McDanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. HoinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hall v. WolffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. NewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Boa v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Rys.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Gonzalez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API